第 2 週 01_如何看透研究資料

確認已經領取作業複本,並在本機Rstudio建立作業專案。

2.1 正向心理學再現研究資料

Woodworth et al. (2017) 重製 Seligman et al. (2005) 的研究,透過網站招募參與者,隨機分派至三種正向介入措施或安慰劑組,參與者的介入效果運用SHI與CES-D兩種量表測量。 Woodworth 等人的結果顯示三種措施的介入效果與安慰劑組沒有統計顯著的差異。 Woodworth et al. (2018) 完整公開他們的研究資料。

2.2 活動一

Woodworth et al. (2018) 的論文中,找出電子書活動一的答案,回覆在討論區的活動一貼文。

2.3 公開資料的重要性

聊聊Dan Ariely的那些事

2.4 活動二

由電子書活動二下載資料壓縮檔到作業專案資料夾,再解壓縮檔案。

檔案管理示範

今日課程結束後建議花些時間整理個人資料夾,再繳交作業展示你的整理成果。

2.5 活動三

根據電子書活動三的指示,回覆問題答案在討論區的活動三貼文。

2.5.1 參考文獻

References

Kristal, Ariella S., Ashley V. Whillans, Max H. Bazerman, Francesca Gino, Lisa L. Shu, Nina Mazar, and Dan Ariely. 2020. “Signing at the Beginning Versus at the End Does Not Decrease Dishonesty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (13): 7103–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911695117.
Seligman, Martin E. P., Tracy A. Steen, Nansook Park, and Christopher Peterson. 2005. “Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.” American Psychologist 60 (5): 410–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.
Shu, Lisa L., Nina Mazar, Francesca Gino, Dan Ariely, and Max H. Bazerman. 2012. “Signing at the Beginning Makes Ethics Salient and Decreases Dishonest Self-Reports in Comparison to Signing at the End.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (38): 15197–200. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209746109.
Uri Simonsohn, Joe Simmons, and Leif Nelson. 2021. “[98] Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Field Experiment About Dishonesty.” Data Colada. August 17, 2021. https://datacolada.org/98.
Woodworth, Rosalind J., Angela O’Brien-Malone, Mark R. Diamond, and Benjamin Schüz. 2017. “Web-Based Positive Psychology Interventions: A Reexamination of Effectiveness.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 73 (3): 218–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22328.
———. 2018. “Data from, Web-Based Positive Psychology Interventions: A Reexamination of Effectiveness.” Journal of Open Psychology Data 6 (February): 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.35.